GuvWurld.org

Search
Today's News
Week in Review

» Archives

9-11
Abortion
Afghanistan
Black Kettles
Campaign 2004
Civil Disobedience
Civil Unrest
Clear Channel
Columbia Shuttle
Conflicts of Interest
Context
Corruption
DIY
Death Penalty
Drug War
Economy
Education
Election Reform
Energy
Environment
False Balance
Fascism
Food
Foreign Culture
Foreign Policy
Gay Rights
GuvWurld Essays and Letters
Homelessness
Hurricane Katrina
Inherent Uncertainty
Iraq
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Labor
McCarthyism
Media
Medical
Military
Peace Ambassador
Personnel
Police Brutality
Privacy and Civil Liberties
Propaganda
Religion
Revised Truth
S.A.R.S
Sabotage
Space
Tilts
Tobacco
Transformational Strategy
Voting
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-03-08-aclu-info_x.htm

http://www.nylawyer.com/news/05/03/030905v.html

ACLU says White House blocked information

By Mark Sherman, Associated Press, 3-9-05

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Bush administration used a sweeping interpretation of a provision in the Patriot Act to block disclosure of even innocuous information, the American Civil Liberties Union said Tuesday.

Previously censored material was released for the first time Tuesday in a lawsuit in which a federal judge last year struck down a provision of the Patriot Act. The material the government wanted withheld included the phrase "national security" and this sentence from a statement by an FBI agent: "I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation."

The ACLU and an unnamed Internet service provider challenged the FBI's use of expanded powers under the Patriot Act to compel Internet access firms to turn over information about their customers or subscribers. The companies were then barred from ever disclosing the searches took place.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of New York ruled in September that the law violates the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and the secrecy clause violates the First Amendment because it is a prior restraint on speech. The administration is appealing the decision.

The lawsuit itself was made public only after the ACLU reached agreement with the Justice Department on a heavily edited version.

The Justice Department insisted that the legal gag order encompass any suggestion that a firm had been served with a "national security letter," the term for the documents the FBI would issue to obtain the customer information. The ACLU protested that such information was obvious because there would otherwise be no lawsuit.

"At every turn, the government has sought to censor even the most innocuous, non-sensitive information about this case," said ACLU associate legal director Ann Beeson. "The use of 'national security' to suppress non-sensitive information deprives the public of basic information about government activity."

Justice Department spokesman Kevin Madden declined to discuss specific material that had been censored. "Redactions in classified documents are made with careful consideration of national security concerns and after input from law enforcement agencies," Madden said.

The edited documents were letters from the Justice Department and the ACLU, legal filings, a statement from ACLU executive director Anthony Romero and the FBI agent's declaration.

The agent described his delivery of the letter and conversations with its recipient and an ACLU lawyer. The statement had been blacked out in its entirety, except for the agent's declaration that he was telling the truth.

The name of the Internet firm remains secret.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press.

For problems with this page contact badlink AT guvwurld DOT org